Sun Flakes are Coming

SUN FLAKES ARE COMING



The shed magnetic field, like snow flakes, will shower Earth and the surrounding bodies with magnetic flakes.  These strong energy balls will be responsible for immediate dna mutations, instant emplaced cold bodies, interruptions of planetary communications and possibly permanent damage to the existing energy grid.   

Outside our heliosphere an ongoing expansion of the electron/hole pairs will reach a maximum and begin contracting rapidly.  This instant-on contraction will create a ripple effect that will knock the flakes off the sun and begin our catastrophic global weather.  All heated cores will seek to release heat.   

The effect  due to the sudden contraction of the electron/hole pairs will   create a dense body correctly termed an LT (light terminus) starbit.  It will be a miniature neutron star too small to be seen.  This body will exercise pull on all bodies in the heliosphere.  It could be as limited as the compression wave or as maximized as to draw Earth's lithosphere upward from a focused point.  

This effect was maximized perhaps 25,000 y ago at the sudden end of the iceage.  The Earth was within the energy stream of the electron/holes not protected by the heliosphere which had been reduced to possibly Mercury.  The ice cover was responsible for maintaining Earth-like conditions and preventing a Mars event here on Earth.  The reoccurring energy stream of compression cycles at 5,000 y; each returning event less energetic and compressing less of the heliosphere.  Earth has been inside the heliosphere since the 25,000 y event.  We are not able to escape the effects of the sun flakes tho.  The heat release from the core is also inescapable.   

The area of edginess that is termed BC in the electric universe is where matter and antimatter meet; a layer of Majorana fermions.  In the past this layer has been on the face of the Earth, perhaps facilitated by the sun flakes of magnetic energy.  Our current compression is outside the Earth and will not produce the antigravity phenomena that is the hallmark of the Majorana fermions interactions.   

An inescapable conclusion drawn is the our smarter selves had advanced to our level before the Majorana interactions began to end at perhaps 15,000 y ago.  We have evidently resurrected ourselves to  this level many times.   
Why the energy is decreasing over time is due to the source. I believe it to be either a LT starbit known as Proxima Centauri shedding neutrinos that produce the energy stream of electron/hole pairs or an unknown factor outside the heliosphere possibly the galactic nucleus.   


It is inevitable that the energy stream release will be identified as a gravity wave.

This is an older paper I need to update; I think that this NASA plan to smack the Moon is tied to our sun's current ongoing magnetic reversal.  The increased magnetic field of current time is going to depart with the reversal.

How do you 'freeze in' a magnetic field?  Douse it in a stronger magnetic field.  Water increases the effect of the magnetic field.  Our pre history is indicative of a strong magnetic field on Earth that may have been global temporarily or even sporadic globally.  Since we are not able to recreate this field energy here the only other option is to try to use what provided the field before; the sun's magnetic reversal.

NASA says the sun flakes off its old magnetic field; if this is true NASA hopes to use the field to submerge the Earth.  Whatever field exists at that time will be frozen in.  We are currently experiencing a higher degree of magnetism which I believe is due to the nearly-departed LT starbit.  The sun's magnetic reversal has been predicted now due and late.

The NASA satellites due to impact the Moon tomorrow are a calculated effort to strike the sun with enough energy to initiate the flaking of the old magnetic field or to disturb the sun sufficiently to bathe E with a direct impact of solar magnetic field.  This bath of magnetic field discard would be sufficient to 'set' the magnetic field in place permanently.  This is desirable.

But I wonder if the interpretation of the sun discarding its old magnetic field is correct.  Does the sun flake its old magnetic field?  On NASA sun website is a post referencing a CME doing a somersault and another of a solar flare reaching up into the coronasphere to 'draw in' an expended cme.  It appears the sun does not like to have departing energy dwaddle.  If so then the old magnetic field would have to depart in a big hurry.

Were those round balls seen in the coronasphere of the sun magnetic energy?  Has the sun been shedding energy all along and we did not know it?  Are those balls of light blazing across states actually old magnetic fields of the sun?

This smack the moon is a way to discover if the sun's magnetic field is still there.  The vibrations will 'ring the moon' and as is evident the sun will echo these vibrations.  We see this activity in earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and impacts from space on our Earth and the other bodies of the sun.

Will this smack the moon make the sun drop its old magnetic field?  If it is still there?  Such a small impact but still it should tell us whether the sun's magnetic field is whole or in part.  If the sun is shedding it magnetic field in drops that would explain why the Earth in history has fragmented magnetic fields as described. 

Smack That Moon

How do you 'freeze in' a magnetic field?  Will we find out when NASA smacks the Moon December 16, 2012 Monday?

When SunDo rocketed through the clouds and created synchronized water crystals spinning did it actually create a frozen in field of magnetism?

Will the vibrations that are created when the Moon is 'rung like a bell' set our current magnetic field into place permanently?

http://www.science27.com/Earth/index.htm
 http://wiki.answers.com/Q/3_ways_to_make_a_magnet_and_3_ways_to_destroy_a_magnet

It's the GAS

Gas clouds make stars.  The formation of a galactic spiral occurs when afterward and as this paper notes, star formation in our time has degraded into the result of collisions of galaxies.
 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110913195555.htm

That should indicate that we are observing an aging universe.

Is dingy gas star forming?  Maybe not.  It is just a guess but I think gas full of 'used gas--dust' is not able to form stars.  So the answer to the question of why stars are no longer forming is that stars have been formed.

How LOH stars are made

LIGHT OVER HEAVY MAGNETIC STARS

LOH stars baffle us with their magnificent magnetic field. A star that is a magnetar that for all intents and purposes is a normal sequence star of modest magnetic field. Their discovery is due to bursts and flares ---magnetar-like activity---from a pulsar whose magnetic field is very low.

Our science has only just begun to be able to determine these kinds of stars of which only two are identified. Science projects that stars that nova into neutrons are dependent upon their weight to become red, white, decaying into brown and black. These are the normal outcomes for novas in which beautiful photographs of the expelled gas field vividly shine in x-ray emissions.

In the center, most unusually exactly the center, sits the nova remnant. In looking at the Crab Pulsar, science has now determined there is no significant gravity wave emission. That would indicate massive magnetic field in play. The Crab is surrounded by the gases from the nova that created the neutron. Are the gases an indication that the magnetic field has weakened after creating the neutron?

In our new class of LOH stars like SGR 0418 there is no accompanying gas cloud, just the neutron. Where did the gas go?

In creating a LOH star like SGR 0418 the magnetic field controls the implosion so that the mass compresses into a neutron but clearly the gas must expand when heated. How strong would the magnetic field have to be to hold the gas from expansion into space?

I propose a LOH star is created in a two-step process. First the nova creates the neutron under a dense magnetic field with the gases in an outer envelope but held from escaping. Because of the strength of the magnetic field this event would be recognized as a brief nova before fading immediately into black. The neutron writhes with massive magnetic fields trapped inside; the magnetic field having much less strength but still powerful cloaks the neutron with a gas shell of normal magnetism. The gas is conserved and no expanding nova is seen.

If this scenario is at all possible it may be able to explain the missing mass. Our galaxy, indeed our universe, may have been much denser with thick plasma. As the roiling gases created the magnetic fields that actively compressed, this action would have made the main sequence stars we see. Only as the stars shed energy would the internal field of massive magnetism be able to be identified through intermittent flaring.

As the universe we now see is thin with gas, it is probable that most all stars are hidden magnetic strongholds under a thin veneer of light magnetism?

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1998/ast20may98_1/

This site even states that dead/dying neutrons stars litter the universe. O Manuel ‘s Iron Sun
supports this concept of our Sol being a neutron star functioning with neutron repulsion fueling the CMEs and flares.

It would seem strange after all this time searching for the missing link between magnetism and gravity, first proposed by Maxwell then restated in Einstein’s Relativity theory that calls for the Higgs bosun still unfound, that there is actually some entity called dark energy or dark matter that exists out there.

What we actually see is magnetism. And now that satellite technology allows us to peer farther all we see is magnetism. If the extent of our technology is waiting for flaring to id a magnetic star hiding behind low magnetism, then why is it not possible for most of our stars to be super magnetic with a low surface magnetism? It is actually.

The above noted paper says it takes millions (billions) of years for a magnetic star to degrade; well the universe is old enough for that event to showcase itself. And it would do that by flaring, CMEs, sunspots, etc., through the low surface magnetic field. There would be no formations as that happened far in the past; all we would see now is the gradual degradation of the energy being released.

First, the surface magnetic field would degrade with more and more erosion of the light magnetic field with the stronger field underneath becoming prevalent which we would notice as a strongly magnetic star. The gas field I propose that is held over the strong magnetic field would be blown off perhaps in small increments as would be experienced in a polar magnetic reversal or as a small planetary nova, exposing the underlying strong field. This in turn would degrade via NR. O Manuel presents a strong case.

We look heaven-ward and perhaps what we see is the missing dark matter/dark energy. Held within in the normal stars could the the magnetism that allows gravity to hold sway. The release of the neutron repulsion may restore our missing balance between anti-matter and matter. LOH magnetic stars may the the simple answer.

http://phys.org/news/2012-08-sun-perfectly-baffles-scientists.html

Our star Sol is so perfectly round that scientists say there must be a mechanism unaccounted for to create and hold this shape. It brings to mind another beautifully centered object 1E161348-5055 in the middle of RCW 103 slowing much too fast to be only 2.000 y old.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/02/complex-organic-matter-discovered-to-be-created-by-stars-throughout-the-universe.html

These complex molecules may indicate life was anticipated as Freeman Dyson said. It is not that we are the apex of attainment; it is just that our Sol has done 90% of the work and only 10% was left for life to finish up. Voila! C’est ici!

Sol is a Clark Kent

What a gravity wave is and is not

Astrophysics Magnetic wave energy fluxes for late-type stars

www.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/~ulm/papers/umf2001.pdf - Cached
Key words. methods: numerical – stars: chromospheres – stars: coronae – stars:
magnetic fields – MHD. 1. Introduction. It has become clear in recent years that …

NASA identifies magnetic reconnections via flux tubes and the shock waves they produce.


ALL PICTURES AND ASSOCIATED COMMENTARY ARE FROM ANN’S ASTRONOMY
WEBSITE


If Hoag’s Object is not gravity formed but by the event of being in the sight of a perfectly aimed electro-magnetic field that would make it a product of symmetry and not gravity.


http://annesastronomynews.com/pod-archive/may-2012/
May 2012 So-called “classic” ring galaxies are generally formed by the collision of a small galaxy with a larger disk-shaped galaxy. This collision produces a density wave in the disk which leads to a characteristic ring-like appearance. Such an event would have happened at least 2-3 billion years in the past. However, there is no sign of any second galaxy that would have acted as the “bullet”, and the core of Hoag’s Object has a very low velocity relative to the ring, making the typical formation hypothesis quite unlikely.

Monoceros:

May 1, 2012

V838 Monocerotis, a star that experienced a major outburst

V838 Monocerotis (V838 Mon) is a red variable star about 20,000 light-years away in the constellation Monoceros. It spans about 14 light-years, what makes it one of the largest known stars. It did not expel its outer layers; instead it grew enormously in size.
The previously unknown star was observed on January 6, 2002 experiencing a major outburst. The initial light curve resembled that of a typical nova eruption, it was then realized to be something completely different. The reason for the outburst is still uncertain.
V838 Monocerotis reached maximum visual magnitude on February 6, 2002, after which it started to dim rapidly, as expected. However, in early March the star started to brighten again, this time mostly in infrared wavelengths. Yet another brightening in infrared occurred in early April, after which the star returned to near its original brightness before the eruption. The light curve produced by the eruption is unlike anything previously seen.
It appears that the progenitor star is considerably more massive and luminous than the Sun, but at the time of maximum V838 Mon was one of the most luminous stars in the Milky Way. The brightening was caused by an abnormal rapid expansion of the outer layers of the star. The laws of thermodynamics dictate that expanding gas cools. Therefore the star became extremely cool and deep red. In fact, some astronomers argue that the spectra of the star resembled that of L-type brown dwarfs. If that is the case, V838 Monocerotis would be the first known L-type supergiant.
Rapidly brightening objects are known to produce a light echo. The light continues propagating outward through a cloud of dust surrounding the star. The light reflects or “echoes” off the dust and then travels to Earth.
In the case of V838 Monocerotis, the light echo produced was unprecedented. While the photos taken by Hubble appear to depict an expanding spherical shell of debris, they are actually formed by reflecting dust that is mostly ‘behind’ the star, not in ‘front’ of it.
There is strong evidence that the V838 Monocerotis system is very young and still embedded in the nebula from which it formed.
These images are showing the expansion of the light echo, from May 20, 2002 until February 8, 2004.

From 2012: Another enigma:November 20, 2012

NGC 3132, a bright planetary nebula in Vela

Image Credit: NASA, ESA and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

NGC 3132 (also known as the Eight-Burst Nebula because of its figure-8 appearance through small telescopes, or the Southern Ring Nebula) is a very bright, asymmetric planetary nebula of approximately 0.4 light-year across, located about 2,000 light-years away in the southern constellation Vela. It is moving away from us at 49 kilometers per second.
Despite their name, planetary nebulae have nothing to do with planets. The name of planetary nebulae arose because of the visual similarity between some round planetary nebulae and the planets Uranus and Neptune when viewed through early telescopes.
When a star with a mass up to eight times that of the Sun approaches the end of its life, it blows off its outer shells and begins to lose mass. This allows the hot, inner core of the star to radiate strongly, causing this outward-moving cocoon of gas to glow brightly as a planetary nebula.
Over the next several thousand years, the nebula will gradually disperse into space, and then the star will cool and fade away for billions of years as a white dwarf. Our own Sun is expected to undergo a similar fate, but fortunately this will not occur until some 5 billion years from now.
There are two stars close together — a binary system — in the center of NGC 3132, one of 10th magnitude, the other 16th. It’s the dim star, not the bright one, near the center that caused multiple outbursts and originated the intricate, somewhat concentric structure of the nebula. This hot central star is a white dwarf of about 100,000 K that has now blown off its layers and is making the nebula fluoresce brightly from the emission of its intense ultraviolet radiation.
This expanding cloud of gas is one of the nearest known planetary nebulae. The gases are expanding away from the central star at a speed of about 14.4 kilometers per second. Neither the unusual shape of the surrounding cooler shell nor the structure and placements of the cool filamentary dust lanes running across NGC 3132 are well understood.
This image is taken with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 onboard the Hubble Space Telescope using three different color filters. North is to the bottom left hand corner of this image.

Just Right formation: Champagne: November 10, 2012

Holmberg II, a dwarf irregular galaxy in Ursa Major

Image Credit: NASA & ESA

Holmberg II (also known as Arp 268 and UGC 4305) is a very bright dwarf irregular galaxy located only about 9.8 million light-years away in the constellation Ursa Major. It is a member of the M81 Group of galaxies, and one of the few that isn’t distracted by gravity from other nearby galaxies.
This small galaxy is a patchwork of dense star-forming regions and extensive barren areas with less material, which can stretch across thousands of light-years.
Holmberg II is dominated by giant bubbles of glowing gas – the largest about 5,500 light-years wide – which are regions of old star formation. The cavities are blown by high-mass stars (as these stars form in dense regions of gas and dust, they expel strong stellar winds that blow away the surrounding material) and of gas by the shock waves produced in supernovae (the violent explosions that mark the end of the lives of massive stars).
As a dwarf galaxy, it has neither the spiral arms of galaxies like the Milky Way nor the dense nucleus of an elliptical galaxy of which the gravitational pull would destroy the fragile bubbles. This makes Holmberg II a gentle haven where these fragile structures can hold their shape.
New star birth is also taking place, but not in the same areas as the bubbles because these are drained now of gas or dust. The star formation regions in Holmberg II appear as massive, disorganized patches filled with hundreds of young, blue stars, that occupy a relatively large fraction of the disk. One region in particular has almost as many young stars as the famous Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
Holmberg II is the perfect example of the “champagne” model of starbirth – where new stars create even newer ones. It works like this: when a bubble is created by stellar winds, it moves outwards until it reaches the edge of the molecular cloud that spawned it. At the exterior edge, dust and gas have been compressed and form a nodule similar to a blister. Here another new star forms.. and triggers again… and triggers again… similar to the chain reaction which happens when you open a bottle of champagne.
The galaxy also hosts an ultraluminous X-ray source in the middle of three gas bubbles in the top right of the image. There are competing theories as to what causes this powerful radiation — one intriguing possibility is an intermediate-mass black hole which is pulling in material from its surroundings.
Holmberg II enables astronomers to study star birth in an environment that isn’t disturbed by density waves (as happens in larger galaxies such as the Milky Way) or by deformation caused by the pull of another galaxy, and that is conveniently close.
This image was captured by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. It is a composite of visible and near-infrared exposures taken using the Wide Field Channel of Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys.


Papillon in the LMC:
of the Day: The Papillon Nebula
Anne's Picture of the Day
nov 242012

November 24, 2012

The Papillon Nebula, a compact H II “blob” in the LMC

Image Credit: M. Heydari-Malayeri (Paris Observatory) et al., ESA and NASA

The Papillon Nebula (N159-5) is a butterfly-shaped High Excitation Blob (HEB) of less than 2 light-years across within the nebula N159, a turbulent star-forming region of more than 150 light-years across. It is located in the Large Magellanic Cloud, about 170,000 light-years away in the constellation of Dorado.
High Excitation Blobs (HEBs) are compact H II regions, a rare class of ionized nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds. They are characterized by high excitation, small size, high density, and large extinction compared to typical Magellanic Cloud H II regions. These objects are tightly linked to the early stages of massive star formation, when the stars begin to hatch from their parental molecular clouds.
This compact ionized “blob” is buried in the center of the maelstrom of glowing gases and dark dust in N159. This image shows unprecedented details of the structure and internal morphology of the Papillon nebula (“Papillon” is French for “butterfly”).
A possible explanation of its bipolar shape is the outflow of gas by strong stellar winds from newborn massive stars (over 10 times the mass of our Sun), hidden in the central absorption zone. Such stars are so hot that their radiation pressure halts the infall of gas and directs it away from the stars in two opposite directions. Presumably, a dense equatorial disk formed by matter still trying to fall in onto the stars focuses the outstreaming matter into the bipolar directions.
It is rather rare that we can see massive stars so early after their birth.
This image was taken on September 5, 1998 with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 onboard the Hubble Space Telescope.



A galaxy with closed lobes: The Cheeseburger:

Anne’s Picture of the Day: The Cheeseburger Nebula

Anne's Picture of the Day
dec 102012

December 10, 2012

The Cheeseburger Nebula, a planetary nebula in Cygnus

Image Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA; Acknowledgement: Linda Morgan-O’Connor

The Cheeseburger Nebula (NGC 7026) is a very bright bipolar planetary nebula of a little over one light-year across at its longest dimension, located about 6,000 light-years away in the constellation of Cygnus (The Swan). It is approaching us at approximately 40.6 kilometers per second.
Despite their name, planetary nebulae have nothing to do with planets. The name of planetary nebulae arose because of the visual similarity between some round planetary nebulae and the planets Uranus and Neptune when viewed through early telescopes.
A planetary nebula represents the final stage in the evolution of a star similar to our Sun. Only a few thousand years ago, the star at the center of The Cheeseburger nebula was a red giant, but when it ran out its nuclear fuel, it ejected its outer layers into space to form this glowing, expanding nebula, while leaving behind its hot stellar core in the center.
Over the next several thousand years, this cloud of glowing gas and dust will gradually disperse into space, and then the star will cool and fade away for billions of years as a white dwarf. Our own Sun is expected to undergo a similar fate, but fortunately this will not occur until some 5 billion years from now.
The Cheeseburger has two big closed lobes — filled with very hot gas that emits X-rays — that are roughly butterfly-shaped, and a bright equatorial waist that contains large amounts of molecular gas and dust with the hot central white dwarf star right in the middle. Because the stellar winds that form the lobes are still plowing into the surrounding material, and because the lobes are closed, the hot gas hasn’t been able to escape.
Which could mean that eventually all that material may blow out of the lobes, popping them. When that happens – in what’s called a “blowout” – the gas will escape and it’ll probably form long, weird, filaments.
This image was produced by the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 aboard the Hubble Space Telescope. It shows the vivid colors that are produced by the mix of gases present in NGC 7026: starlight in green, light from glowing nitrogen gas in red, and light from oxygen in blue (in reality, this appears green, but the colour in this image has been shifted to increase the contrast).



The articles and beautiful astronomy pictures are from Ann’s Astronomy website.

This article:

http://voxcharta.org/2012/10/14/discovery-of-multiple-dust-shells-beyond-1-arcmin-in-the-circumste

says multiple shell remnants have been discovered. I suggest these are the residues of controlled novas. This would leave ‘dust’ and this dust then becomes rings. This also would indicate that controlled novas are the majority and not the minority; our fascination beautiful expanded hot gas nova phenomena is due to the fact that it is currently the tip of our technological progress.


Getting Closer: a star of red giant size is discovered to not have ‘come back to life’ but had a small companion that could not absorb the amount of cosmic wind offloading from the giant and went boom. The scientists know this as there WAS NO GAS SHELL PRODUCED.
I speculate that our Sol went nova as O Manuel says in Iron Sun, but the gas shell was not allowed to escape and instead was recaptured and layered on the controlled nova product that was a high magnetic body and in doing so created a lighter magnetic shell producing a LOH (low magnetic field over high) star.
Here: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22448-astrophile-bornagain-star-faked-its-death-scene.html
NSV 11749 is a symbiotic nova. Tho in similar red giant rebirths (only 4 known) there is a gap that shows when the shock wave impacts and that indicates the white dwarf erased the cosmic wind in the immediate vicinity of itself.
There are endless variations of solar formation and a twin system in a bubble shell emprisoned by massive magnetism would force this energy inward, creating a massive magnetic body overlaid with a lightly magnetized charged gas envelope. Sol.

This may be what occurred ½ billion years ago. This might explain the small LT starbit I propose returns to visit the Oort shell, the place of its birth, on its nearest orbital point, before looping outward toward Centauri A&B.

Note that the LMC is fraught with gaseous bubbles. A complete and semi bubble appear in astronomical recordings. One might conjecture this gas would normally be compressed magnetically into a central trap. That has not been done and the gas roams at will within the cloud being compressed by roving bands of current sponsored magnetism. I propose this cloud must be saturated with electro magnetism and the gas freely available for star-forming.



Now the question is does this substantiate my theory of black hole aging and the regurgitation of the gas? As it is unknown if the LMC ever hosted a black hole, and the cloud shows no sign of former spiraling that would indicate a previous life, I propose the cloud never acquired a central electro-magnetic trap. There is evidence of a papillon shape which may be indicative of a Birkeland current pinch providing star forming. Could it be that stars form without the aid of a gravity disc rotation?

Would a disc have to be more massive that the LMC could produce for it to acquire a LT electromagnetic body? Would the BC s have to collimate? I suggest the aging of a LT central body would be intimately connected to the decreasing pressure so the growth of the LT star body would have to be connected to increasing pressure supplied not by gravity but by electromagnetism.

How large do gas clouds exist? Is there a size that always falls to forming a central LT body?
Would gas clouds too small to acquire a LT star body be a preferential home for life?




Gravity waves are not compression waves, pressure waves, etc. All of those actions exist within our small galaxy. Gravity waves are conjectured to exist when proposed black holes trajectories cross paths. This phenomena of gravity waves is associated with black holes because both are GRAVITY descriptions of galactic proportions.

I depict LT starbodies as primarily electromagnetic traps whose function as light mazes depends on massive gas pressure; the kind generated by massive magnetic fields. Hence when this particular magnetic pressure is not able to be generated the LT starbody cannot hold the gas inside and exhausts it into the galaxy in spite of the fact it still resides at the center of a gravity galaxy. Thus we see swollen galactic centers claimed to be massive black holes where they are exhausted gases from the LT starbody. This hot gas streams outward expanding and cooling.

The gas becomes cold; the galaxy disappears from visible to invisible. The material in this now cold gas becomes disorganized and loosely focused. It may even degrade into a cloud or lesser. How a LT starbody degrades after being emptied of gas could be as simple as becoming a clump of stars.

We are told the galactic winds can clear entire galaxies;   such enormous power could rightly belong to only the galactic nucleus.  And this is true.  

In researching galactic winds on the net, I finally found what I was looking for. Researchers looked at the data for galactic winds and found that all 22 of the galaxies with winds were newly formed with many, many stars in dense proximity.  I began to think about how these winds originated.  

I have stated that a black hole does not exist and it does not.  What it is is an electromagnetic body that holds photons in a maze with strongly pressurized gas.  Researchers like the Nuker group have proposed that there is a ratio of weight between the galactic nucleus and the galaxy proper; the galactic nucleus being ½ of 1% of the galaxy.  At this point they found, the galactic nucleus goes quiessence.  All the formed globular clusters from the birth of the galaxy when the electromagnetic field was its densest and strongest, all the subsequent activity of jetting no longer occurs. The variations between the weight of the core and the galaxy are handled in a different way.  

Spiral galaxies are most tightly wound at their youngest.  As they age, their jetting lags their spirals relax, their core tao becomes sloppy.  Their center magnetic field degrades.  The tao we recognize as the loop of twisted material at the core.  I propose that all incoming matter that increase the ratio of core to galaxy is dealt with in a relaxed manner.  Since it can only be a small gas cloud, the tao is able eject this matter without the electric field needed to produce globular clusters.  The twisted loop does not need the electric field of enormous power to shape itself; it acts like a Roman at an orgy; reclining it blows this excessive energy outward horizontally along the galactic equator.  

As this path takes it through the densest part of the galaxy, its path should be obvious.  And it should be obvious it takes the path of least resistance.  This energy NASA has identified.  It is not the twin of a sun eaten, nor a planet that wandered too close and was repelled.  It is an action created by the nucleus as a response to an unbalance in the tao.  Scientists have postulated that only 10% of a gas cloud is absorbed by the nucleus and the other 90% must be the energy blown out by the nucleus at speeds which deny it any form except energy.  At the galactic rim we see these sudden appearances of novas which are the energy converting upon slowing to mass/matter.  There must be extraordinary amounts of gas exhausted by this formation of matter.  

I propose that aging spiral galaxies develop gas fogs at first around their equatorial region which has been seen in our Milky Way and identified vicariously.  As the galactic nucleus continues to age and blow out horizontally, more and more gas accumulates at the equatorial rim and spreads producing the gas cloud scientists have only identified in 2012.  The entire Milky Way is wrapped in a gas bubble shell.  This is due to the aging equatorial blow outs of gas along the galactic equator to the rim.  The enormous bubble shapes extending from the axial galactic alignments are the remnants of our youthful Milky Way creating globular clusters.  

Science discovery of the fact that the Milky Way is gas-cloud wrapped should solve the missing mass also.  These gases have long since cooled and are not easily detectable.  Are they our missing mass?  If there are so many gas-wrapped galaxies that they equate to 90% of the mass of the universe, consider the age.  

If our Milky Way is old, and blows out excess gas, and is losing pressure  needed to keep the electromagnetic field at the core stabilized, then if incoming gas clouds fail to arrive, the electromagnetic field itself could degrade into less strongly held matter.  

As it stands now, the galactic core blasts out only excess over what is needed for stability.  This blow out is what scientists term the galactic wind.  As the galactic core ages into the galactic wind stage, it blows at first more often which is what scientists found in the 22 dense galaxies.  The core has to act more often to a surplus by blowing.  As the surplus falls off and the balance of weight is achieved, it will blow less often and gas will begin to accumulate at the rims where scientists have noted many new young stars are found.  Birth products of the galactic wind.  

It is my proposal that this gas noted in its midway stage in such as the Sombero galaxy is a galaxy in progress toward becoming shrouded in gas; spiral galaxies are new, not old.  The aged disappear under a shell of blown out gas from the core.  To produce this shell would take a ongoing input that the core expels over time.  

The galactic wind therefore, is a planet perambulator and a solar chaperone.